Can creationsts deny ALL the dating methods ?

If all the many independant dating methods are so inaccurate, some of which are listed below, then the question is, why do they all corroborate with each other..?

Simply denying this won't wash, because they all do.

# So, how do creationists explain why they all concurr..? #

AMS (Accelerator Mass Spectrometry) Radiocarbon Dating

Archaeomagnetic Dating

Chronological Analysis

Dendrochronology

Fluoride Dating

Luminescence Dating

Mean Ceramic Date

Obsidian Hydration Analysis

Oxidizable Carbon Ratio Dating

Paleomagnetic Dating

Potassium-Argon Dating

Racemization Dating

Seriation

Carbon dating inaccuracies are a thing of the past, as the science behind it has evolved, as do different dating methods, as does all science. Current mainstream scientific principles and understandings are wholly verifiable, and are tested every day.

Religious dogma on the other hand, is an inchanging, stagnant, and an outdated relic of the past.

All intellegent answers welcome..

Can creationsts deny ALL the dating methods ?codes for myspace

Yet another Atheist sermon.

Can creationsts deny ALL the dating methods ?cute myspace myspace.com

And as *Christian* PhD in Physics fuel for you...

http://www.asa3.org/aSA/resources/Wiens....

Excerpt... "It has become increasingly clear that these radiometric dating techniques agree with each other and as a whole, present a coherent picture..."
Yes, radiological dating methods have been shown to be extremely UNreliable.....they were invented by evolutionists to try to prove evolution theory.

What is usually ignored is the fact that external environmental factors over time CAN in many cases ALTER the decay rates.

Read here for a great summary on why they are unreliable:

http://www.trueorigin.org/dating.asp

Scripture says God SPOKE all things into existence with His Word:

" By the Word of the Lord were the heavens created, and all the host of them by the breath of His mouth.... For HE SPAKE AND IT WAS DONE; HE COMMANDED AND IT STOOD FAST". (psalm 33:6-9)
All dating methods are based on the supposition that the speed with which things changed have remained constant since the beginning of time.

Since we have not been recording such changes since the beginning of time, we cannot use them to definitively measure such an event.

We can only make a best guess based on what we can see right now.
Well, to answer your question plainly, anyone can deny anything because nothing now known is the complete factual account of all of creation and so long an inkling of gray area is existing (as it ever shall be) there will be those who will use their minds to freely express them self in the best way fitting to themselves.

Insofar as your pre-qualification of "Intelligent" answers being welcomed, I apologize for not fulfilling that portion of your offer.

FREE THOUGHT FOREVER!

ORDO ab CHAO
They all corroborate with each other because they all function around the idea that they all rely on a time structure that inaccurately places the beginning of time. These methods all are put on a time frame where time started millions of years ago, in fact, time started only about 3000 years ago.
You can assume that the dating methods agree with each other because they are correct OR you can assume that they are all incorrect because the Flying Spaghetti Monster is changing the results with His Noodly Appendage.

It is up to you.
Oh, give me the bomb again. Scientists never want to talk about that now, do they? Or how about PCBs? and DDT? Not static, eh? All sciences are evolving, and Theology is a science. So pooh on you.
The universe must have and ending somewhere but I don't the human mind can fathom it, check out the link below to help you. It will answer many of your questions
They can deny it all they want. Show them this and they'll be running for cover.

Our genetic link to the great apes has already been illustrated by Ken R. Miller and associates and proven by Hillier et al. We SHARE A COMMON ANCESTOR AND DID NOT COME FROM (emphasis only not yelling) them. This research has been verified by scientists around the world. Have to love those supercomputers for mapping out genomes.

In lay terms, we are “cousins”.

Apes have 48 chromosomes; humans 46. Within our genetic make-up is a FUSED pair of primate chromosomes which accounts for the difference.

The genetic marker is on Human chromosome number 2, site base 114,455,823 to 114,455,838.

“Generation and Annotation of the DNA sequences of Human Chromosomes 2 and 4.”

Hillier et al; Nature 434, 724-731 7 (April 2005)
oh...this question is not easy to answer.